Pentagon says US not veering into a new, endless war

2026-03-02 - 23:53

US defence officials hold a briefing in Washington as the Pentagon downplays fears of an open-ended conflict following air strikes on Iran. (EPA Images pic) WASHINGTON: The Pentagon played down concerns on Monday that the US attack on Iran risked plunging the United States into a new, open-ended conflict in the Middle East, even as officials declined to give a timeline and cautioned they expected more US casualties. The United States and Israel launched their most ambitious attacks on Iran in decades on Saturday, killing Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, sinking 11 Iranian warships and hitting more than 1,250 targets so far. In the first Pentagon briefing since the conflict began, US General Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters it would take time to achieve US military objectives in Iran. Defence decretary Pete Hegseth listed those objectives in primarily military terms, saying the Pentagon sought to destroy Iran’s navy and its missile capabilities that could shield any covert attempts by Tehran to later build a nuclear weapon. Iran denies it wants nuclear weapons. “To the media outlets and political left screaming ‘ENDLESS WARS’ – stop. This is not Iraq. This is not endless,” said Hegseth, a former Fox News host and Army veteran who served in Iraq from 2005 to 2006 and later deployed to Afghanistan. Still, Hegseth dismissed a reporter who asked about the timeline for the campaign, saying Trump would not be pinned down, even after the president suggested on Sunday that strikes against Iran could go on for the next four weeks. US casualties The US and Israeli attacks have triggered an Iranian retaliatory response, but US military forces and US allies in the region have intercepted many of the most dangerous drones and missiles. Still, some of the attacks succeeded in inflicting US losses. The US military said on Monday a total of six US service members were killed so far as a result of Iran operations. Another six US service members were injured on Monday in a single incident when Kuwaiti air defences shot down three F-15 fighter jets by mistake. Several additional US troops have suffered serious injuries, the Pentagon says. “We expect to take additional losses,” Caine told the briefing, adding the United States would work to minimise US losses but “this is major combat operations.” War of choice? Democrats have accused Trump of risking American lives for a war of choice and have criticised his arguments for abandoning peace talks that mediator Oman said still held promise. Trump has argued, without presenting evidence, that Iran was on track to soon secure the ability to strike the United States with a ballistic missile. His missile claim was not backed by US intelligence reports, and appeared to be exaggerated, according to sources familiar with the reports. Trump administration officials acknowledged in closed-door briefings with congressional staff on Sunday that there was also no intelligence suggesting Iran planned to attack US forces first, two people familiar with the matter said. That appeared to contradict remarks by senior administration officials on Saturday that Trump decided to launch the attacks in part because of indicators that Iranians might strike US forces in the Middle East “perhaps preemptively.” Trump, one of the officials said, was not going to “sit back and allow American forces in the region to absorb attacks.” Reuters/Ipsos polling over the weekend shows just one in four Americans supports US strikes on Iran in part over concerns about harm to US troops, which some analysts say could further weigh down support ahead of November’s midterm elections. Buildup continues As the US-Israeli air war against Iran expanded on Monday, Caine said the US military buildup in the Middle East continued, even after the biggest deployment since the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Even with the US-Israeli strikes, the conservative clerical leaders in Iran have shown no sign of yielding power. Military experts say US and Israeli air power, with no armed force on the ground, may not be enough to drive them out. Hegseth said there were no US troops on the ground. But he also declined to rule out that possibility. “We are not going into the exercise of (saying) what we will or will not do,” Hegseth said. “President Trump ensures that our enemies understand we’ll go as far as we need to go to advance American interests.” “But we’re not dumb about it. You don’t have to roll 200,000 people in there and stay 20 years.”